WHO ARE THEY TRYING TO FOOL
The People have to wake up to what this system is doing to our society. These people are the ones who are mad in the head not the General Public. Just have a look below at what the The Royal College of Psychiatrists have been putting together. This is an absolute load of bollocks. Once a person accepts any entry to the Psychiatric system, that person can never get themselves out. How many times have the people come acrosspeople with genuine complaints only to be sent to one of these quacks and then not having their complaints taken seriously after they have been registered with one of these quacks?
"This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever."
- Sigmund Freud (speaking about the Irish)
The two most original and creative figures in modern psychiatry, Freud and Jung were both proscribed by the Nazis … for both, though holding widely divergent views, upheld the value of the individual personality.
Doctor Freud not only used cocaine himself, but he also prescribed it to his patients. And then he drew his generalizations. Cocaine is a strong sexual arouser. That's why everything Freud invented — all those oedipuses, sphinxes and sphincters — is relevant only to a mental dimension of a patient, whose brain is turned to fried-eggs by cocaine. In such a state, one really has only one problem left — what to do first, to screw his mother or to do away with his father. Of course, until his cocaine runs out. And in those times, there were no problems with supplies. But so long as your daily dose is less than three grams, you don't have to fear either the Oedipus complex, nor other things discovered by Freud.
VOTS states: This people is where psychoanalysis apparently originated from, but yet these are the ones who deem to know people so well. the amount of destruction these lunatics have done to people over the years is just simply out of hand - see Abused Victims Area section for more information.
Come on people wake up and start to smell the heather, look at what is going on here.
They entitled this paper the: Unusually persistent complainants
VOTS States it should be titled: What a load of bollocks
Declaration of interest None. Background Querulous paranoia may have disappeared from the psychiatric literature, but is it flourishing in modern complaints organisations and the courts?
VOTS States: Would this simply be a case that all our complaints organisations are corrupt and do not investigate complaints in the first place adding a snowball effect to a person's initial complaint?
Aims To investigate the unusually persistent complainants who lay waste to their own lives and place inordinate demands and stress on complaints organisations.
VOTS States: So they came up with a system to investigate persistent complainants who place stress on complaints organisations. Again see answer to question number 1.
Method Complaints officers completed questionnaires on both unusually persistent complainants and matched controls.
VOTS States: If investigators did their job abd investigated ratehr than frustrated they wouldn't have to be filling in useless forms now would they, who do they think their fooling?
Results Persistent complainants (distinguished by their pursuit of vindication and retribution) consumed time and resources and resorted to both direct and veiled threats. Attempts to distinguish these people from a control group on the basisof the manner in which their claims were initially managed failed.
VOTS States: Maybe if these quacks considered that the persisance for vindication was because their complaint had been snowballed in the first place, and what about the consumed time on the innocent party by the corrupt complaints departments frustrating people consistently. The attempts to distinguish the people from a controlled group, Is it meant that the control group would be the ones who will just go away. It would be correct to say that the corrupt complaints departments who frustrate information disclosure have manage failed consistently.
Conclusions Persistent complainants’ pursuit of vindication and retribution fits badly with complaints systems established to deliver reparation and compensation. These complainants damaged the financial and social fabric of their own lives and frightened those dealing with their claims. The study suggests methods of early detection and alternative management strategies.
VOTS States: In other words persistent complainants are a pain in the arse because they just won't go away because the complaints system and proceedure is structured in such a way that the complainant is supposed to just go away. Corruption at its very best one would think and the quacks managed and failed system to frustrate the ordinary decent person in the process. The damage to the financial and social fabric should not be seen as a self inflicted wound but rather as damage from outside sources tasked with frustration a simple process of transparency and honesty. The study suggests early methods of detection and alternative management strategies, maybe the first complaint if adhered to would not allow a complainant to be frustrated or their complain to snowball, as for the management strategies maybe taking a complaint and fairly processing same would be the untimate goal and remedy anything else is simply a load of bollocks.
"This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever."
- Sigmund Freud (speaking about the Irish)
The two most original and creative figures in modern psychiatry, Freud and Jung were both proscribed by the Nazis … for both, though holding widely divergent views, upheld the value of the individual personality.
Doctor Freud not only used cocaine himself, but he also prescribed it to his patients. And then he drew his generalizations. Cocaine is a strong sexual arouser. That's why everything Freud invented — all those oedipuses, sphinxes and sphincters — is relevant only to a mental dimension of a patient, whose brain is turned to fried-eggs by cocaine. In such a state, one really has only one problem left — what to do first, to screw his mother or to do away with his father. Of course, until his cocaine runs out. And in those times, there were no problems with supplies. But so long as your daily dose is less than three grams, you don't have to fear either the Oedipus complex, nor other things discovered by Freud.
VOTS states: This people is where psychoanalysis apparently originated from, but yet these are the ones who deem to know people so well. the amount of destruction these lunatics have done to people over the years is just simply out of hand - see Abused Victims Area section for more information.
Come on people wake up and start to smell the heather, look at what is going on here.
They entitled this paper the: Unusually persistent complainants
VOTS States it should be titled: What a load of bollocks
Declaration of interest None. Background Querulous paranoia may have disappeared from the psychiatric literature, but is it flourishing in modern complaints organisations and the courts?
VOTS States: Would this simply be a case that all our complaints organisations are corrupt and do not investigate complaints in the first place adding a snowball effect to a person's initial complaint?
Aims To investigate the unusually persistent complainants who lay waste to their own lives and place inordinate demands and stress on complaints organisations.
VOTS States: So they came up with a system to investigate persistent complainants who place stress on complaints organisations. Again see answer to question number 1.
Method Complaints officers completed questionnaires on both unusually persistent complainants and matched controls.
VOTS States: If investigators did their job abd investigated ratehr than frustrated they wouldn't have to be filling in useless forms now would they, who do they think their fooling?
Results Persistent complainants (distinguished by their pursuit of vindication and retribution) consumed time and resources and resorted to both direct and veiled threats. Attempts to distinguish these people from a control group on the basisof the manner in which their claims were initially managed failed.
VOTS States: Maybe if these quacks considered that the persisance for vindication was because their complaint had been snowballed in the first place, and what about the consumed time on the innocent party by the corrupt complaints departments frustrating people consistently. The attempts to distinguish the people from a controlled group, Is it meant that the control group would be the ones who will just go away. It would be correct to say that the corrupt complaints departments who frustrate information disclosure have manage failed consistently.
Conclusions Persistent complainants’ pursuit of vindication and retribution fits badly with complaints systems established to deliver reparation and compensation. These complainants damaged the financial and social fabric of their own lives and frightened those dealing with their claims. The study suggests methods of early detection and alternative management strategies.
VOTS States: In other words persistent complainants are a pain in the arse because they just won't go away because the complaints system and proceedure is structured in such a way that the complainant is supposed to just go away. Corruption at its very best one would think and the quacks managed and failed system to frustrate the ordinary decent person in the process. The damage to the financial and social fabric should not be seen as a self inflicted wound but rather as damage from outside sources tasked with frustration a simple process of transparency and honesty. The study suggests early methods of detection and alternative management strategies, maybe the first complaint if adhered to would not allow a complainant to be frustrated or their complain to snowball, as for the management strategies maybe taking a complaint and fairly processing same would be the untimate goal and remedy anything else is simply a load of bollocks.
